Required to Change Locks?

[kdhastedt]

...ahhh - a judge with some stones!

Keith

Must of been a blue state...

 

Not bloody likely...it's the eunuch liberal judges in the blue states that need to be drawn and quartered...

http://www.thoseshirts.com/cat.html

Keith

[jagsterr]

The building has cameras - the current owner says he keeps the tapes for 72 hours and then records over them.  Should I save more hours when the building is mine? 

It's not web based - does that allow me to see it from another state, from the convenience of my computer?

Is is then saved somewhere, and if so for how long?
Thanks Jag

p.s.  That was brilliant advice

[Frank Chin]

Tapes got to be changed every so often, or the images on it gets fuzzy as the tape quality goes down. With a PC based system:

- Recording is made to hard drive, image quality remains the same throughout..
- PC also records over old images, but hard disk capacity determines how long before recording over.
- With PC, and internet connection, and proper setup on your end, you can watch whats going on even in real time.
- With PC based systems, you can go with a 4 camera system, 8 or 12 camera system, depending on software.

I looked at some systems mentioned in this thread, and it seems very cost effective. Also had a professional come to my business to look, and a 8 camera system. professionally installed, and WEB enabled, cost in excess of $6,000.00 in NYC.

[AzonPM]

Frank:

My parter is in NYC, he has a great camera guy.  If you want I can hook you up and compare quotes.

[DannyTheGreat]

...ahhh - a judge with some stones!

Keith

Must of been a blue state...

 

Not bloody likely...it's the eunuch liberal judges in the blue states that need to be drawn and quartered...

http://www.thoseshirts.com/cat.html

Keith

It takes some stones to make a decision outside of the bible.

For your wife- http://www.cafepress.com/buy/liberal/-/pv_design_prod/p_storeid.13620626/pNo_13620626/id_5294911/opt_/pg_/c_/fpt_

For Mike- http://www.cafepress.com/buy/liberal/democrat/-/pv_design_details/pg_2/id_15576344/opt_/fpt_/c_360/

For you- http://www.cafepress.com/buy/liberal/-/pv_design_prod/p_storeid.49441586/pNo_49441586/id_11370859/opt_/pg_/c_/fpt_

 

[kdhastedt]

<<It takes some stones to make a decision outside of the bible.>>

I've no problem with decisions made inside or outside the bible -- it's the decisions outside the Constitution that these liberals make up that burn a canyon in my ass...

Keith

[DannyTheGreat]

LOL

No doubt about it. I took the same Oath of Allegiance to defend the Constitution you did. The problem lies in the religiously skewed interpretation by the Republicans. I am by no means a politically defined "liberal", I think they're a bunch of quacks as much as the next guy. Liberalisms true definition is what this county was built on, Freedom!

The same conservative constraints of Republicans are IDENTICAL to the bible, therefore confusing the separation of Church and State. Line one of Amendment I says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

[kdhastedt]

I'm still looking for the "separation of Church and State" verbiage in the Constitution -- I've read it dozens of times and can't seem to find it...all I can find is the part about establishing a Government sanctioned religion -- nothing about the government being completely secular...

Keith

[DannyTheGreat]

"Separation of Church and State" is not in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson coined that phrase.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" is in the Constitution.

I'm in no position to debate Constiutional law but what this means to me is that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. Congress is free to exercise their religion, just as long as no laws are passed forcing others to follow it. If laws can't be passed which favor a particular religions, it seems pretty clear that their must be a separation between religion (Church) and State.

[Rich_in_CT]

Amendment I: Freedom of speech, religion, press, petition and assembly.


Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.2

[kdhastedt]

So where is the part about the "Courts shall appoint no namby-pamby panty waste judges to interpret the Constitution as they see fit with no regard to reality"...?

I'm not seeing that, either!

Keith

[DannyTheGreat]

LOL

You got me there! I don't know how to respond. Any examples of namby-pamby panty waste decisions with no regard to reality in particular? I do have a feeling that if extreme liberal judges were responsible for the namby-pamby decisions regarding the Constitution, the extreme conservative dominated Supreme Court Justices would have that decision overturned in no time.

[jagsterr]

I almost feel at a loss when I am in CA and the property is in OH even through there will be cameras.  I mean, I feel like this tenant has control ove the tapes, not me, and I have to trust that he will reset it every 3 days.  I'm going to search web based security cam.
Thanks, Geeze so much to worry about when you become a landlord.  Tell me guys, is it worth it?

[kdhastedt]

Thanks, Geeze so much to worry about when you become a landlord.  Tell me guys, is it worth it?

Gee whiz, it's almost as if the gurus didn't say anything about this kinda stuff!

LOL...welcome to our world!

Keith