Mccain? Obama?

[fadi]

yeah but if that was relevant, then why Palin? why not someone experienced?

[darkside]

yeah but if that was relevant, then why Palin? why not someone experienced?

Palin IS experienced.  In her time as Mayor and Governor she has made some very bold moves and taken on some very tough challenges.  Obama has ZERO executive experience.  He has less than 5 months actual time in the Senate.  So where is the experience we keep hearing so much about?  Obama is so much smoke and mirrors with absolutely no substance.

And consider that you're comparing McCain's VP to Obama himself.  It's sad to say but true nonetheless -- the bottom of the Republican ticket is more experienced and battle proven than the top of the Democrat ticket.  So the choices are (1) vote for a ticket with a semi-inexperienced but already proven VP or (2) vote for a ticket with a totally inexperienced President with the most liberal voting record in the Senate, terrorist friends, racist preacher, etc.  There really is no comparison; McCain is a better choice all around.

[justin0419]

At least Obama has the liberal majority media in his pocket to cover his inexperience...

[justin0419]

Mike,
You were right all this time.  Just look at this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27122742/?GT1=43001

[jace]

I wish I was rich enough to be a democrat.   : 

[wallacehobbs]

I wish I was rich enough to be a democrat.   : 

Good Subtle point you make here.....