Site Navigation

Investor Information
 Home
 Monthly Update
 Real Estate Articles
 Real Estate Videos
 Real Estate Success Stories
 Real Estate Blog
 Free Investing Books, Audios
 Real Estate Books
 Investing Glossary
 Investing Abbreviations

Real Estate Products
 No Risk Guarantee
 Best Sellers
 All Investing Products
 Real Estate Courses
 Real Estate Audios
 Real Estate Ebooks
 Real Estate Books
 Real Estate Seminars
 Real Estate Games
 Special Offers

Investor Resources
 Hard Money Lenders
 Real Estate Agents
 Handyman Services
 Real Estate Clubs
 Cashflow 101 Clubs
 Business Tools
 Tax Appraisal Districts
 State Property Codes
 State Foreclosure Laws
 Proof of Funds Letter

Discussion Forums
 Networking Forum
 Beginners, Carlton Sheets
 Bird Dogs, Wholesaling
 Foreclosures, Short Sales
 Sub2, Lease Options
 Rehabbing, Landlording
 Financing, Hard Money
 Asset Protection, Legal
 Commercial, Mobile Homes
 Real Estate Marketing
 Random Ramblings

Site Information
 About Us
 Advertise on REIClub
 Contact REIClub
 Link to REIClub
 REIClub Facebook
 REIClub Twitter
 REIClub YouTube
 REIClub Testimonials



Learn Wholesaling
CD's Plus Transcripts
Click Here Now!

--------------------------
REO Experts
Reveal Their Secrets
Click Here Now!


Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2012, 11:00:03 PM

Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
Free Monthly Update
Name:
Email:
Click Here to Register for the Discussion Forums
Real Estate Investing Forums  |  Real Estate Investing  |  Random Ramblings (Moderators: $Cash$, Bluemoon06, kdhastedt, Mdhaas, motivatedceo)  |  Topic: It's a New Record! FORTY MILLION AMERICANS ON FOOD STAMPS « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Print
Author Topic: It's a New Record! FORTY MILLION AMERICANS ON FOOD STAMPS  (Read 1524 times)
phlemboy
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1185



« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2010, 08:24:37 PM »

It seems to me the problem is not with welfare/food stamps programs. The problem is the fact that people are allowed to make it a way of life FOREVER. There should be a time limit of 2 or 3 yrs. Max.  In that time you need to get trained for job. You can complete an Associates degree in 2 - 3 yrs. starting from scratch (I've done it).. You can train to be a nurse or to work in an office. You can even go to a trade school and learn to be an electrician, plumber, carpenter. You can't tell me that it can't be done. I went to school with a single mother of 4. She was on welfare to get her through. They paid for day-care while she was in school. Make no mistake, she was a busy woman and it was hard, but she made it. She's an nurse making about $65K/yr. As long as the govt. is giving, there will be takers. They need to be cut off at some point.. I mean really, if you can't it get together here, where the hell are you gonna go? This is the easiest place in the world to succeed. As far as why this is allowed to go on, I think the answer lies in the fact that those 40 million recipients = 40 million votes to the one who promises to keep them happy.. That's about it in a nutshell..... I think.. rolleyes
Report to moderator   Logged

"Fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son." --Dean Wermer
jfpen
Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 329


« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2010, 09:10:15 PM »

It seems to me the problem is not with welfare/food stamps programs. The problem is the fact that people are allowed to make it a way of life FOREVER. There should be a time limit of 2 or 3 yrs. Max.  In that time you need to get trained for job. You can complete an Associates degree in 2 - 3 yrs. starting from scratch (I've done it).. You can train to be a nurse or to work in an office. You can even go to a trade school and learn to be an electrician, plumber, carpenter. You can't tell me that it can't be done. I went to school with a single mother of 4. She was on welfare to get her through. They paid for day-care while she was in school. Make no mistake, she was a busy woman and it was hard, but she made it. She's an nurse making about $65K/yr. As long as the govt. is giving, there will be takers. They need to be cut off at some point.. I mean really, if you can't it get together here, where the hell are you gonna go? This is the easiest place in the world to succeed. As far as why this is allowed to go on, I think the answer lies in the fact that those 40 million recipients = 40 million votes to the one who promises to keep them happy.. That's about it in a nutshell..... I think.. rolleyes

I agree that the "Safety Net" has turned into a "Hammock" for many. In interviewing prospective tenants, I've had many that were on "disability". There were only a few that I could tell actually were disabled, physically or mentally. A large number are milking the system. The people getting screwed are the working poor. They hate this more than anyone. There was a time where people who took a handout were embarrassed about it and wasted no time getting off of it. The scene in "Cinderella Man" where the main character returns the money he got from welfare is classic. He viewed it as loan to get he and his family through tough times. When he earned some money, he paid it back. I'm for helping the truly needy but lets get rid of the fraudulent abuse of the system.

JP
Report to moderator   Logged
John_in_NC
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2010, 08:26:08 AM »



I'm for helping the truly needy but lets get rid of the fraudulent abuse of the system.

JP

The needy wouldn't need our(taxpayers) help if we didn't loot everyone at the threat of force (by gunpoint). We would be a richer country with richer PRIVATE charities with highly efficient money donated by the richer society directed at the needy. Don't you think that would work many times better and benefit everyone?

It just makes me sick to my stomach to see quotes like the one above, because I know that is how most of society sees it, though it is plain wrong.

« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 08:28:04 AM by John_in_NC » Report to moderator   Logged
Bluemoon06
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2766


« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2010, 09:25:43 AM »

loot everyone at the threat of force (by gunpoint).

What?
Report to moderator   Logged
John_in_NC
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2010, 08:54:21 AM »

Don't pay your taxes, you will have a trial and lose. When they come with the arrest warrant to your home, they WILL have guns. When you are locked up, they WILL have guns! So, in the end, it's the threat of force by guns that make you pay.

The original US Government didn't believe in using the threat of force. That threat has to exist in statist society though, it's the only way it will function.
Report to moderator   Logged
Bluemoon06
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2766


« Reply #20 on: May 27, 2010, 11:30:11 AM »

That is only civilized.  In a civilized country we follow the laws or they come after you with guns.  If we can do whatever we want to we end up just like Somalia.  We have to be made to play well with others.  That means that if I go into your house and steal your stuff they come after me with guns, if I don't pay my taxes they come after me with guns.  We need to follow the law or they come after us with guns.  Are you saying they should not enforce the laws with guns?  We should only follow the laws we agree with?  Do you think that would work?
Report to moderator   Logged
John_in_NC
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


« Reply #21 on: May 27, 2010, 06:13:00 PM »

No in a free society force is only used against criminals.

Not to take your property. How can you call yourself a free society when you use force to take another's rightfully owned property? Totally different concept than against a criminal.

Report to moderator   Logged
Bluemoon06
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2766


« Reply #22 on: May 28, 2010, 10:15:16 AM »

Are you saying that a person that does not pay his taxes is not a criminal?
Report to moderator   Logged
John_in_NC
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


« Reply #23 on: May 28, 2010, 08:16:18 PM »

The subject was force, or the threat of and when it is appropriate. If you think it is appropriate for the government to use force to take your property, then freedom and liberty must be meaningless to you.
Report to moderator   Logged
Bluemoon06
Moderator
Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2766


« Reply #24 on: May 28, 2010, 11:19:13 PM »

The subject was force, or the threat of and when it is appropriate. If you think it is appropriate for the government to use force to take your property, then freedom and liberty must be meaningless to you.

No you said
in a free society force is only used against criminals.

I said that if you don't pay taxes you are a criminal.
Report to moderator   Logged
John_in_NC
Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 767


« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2010, 11:08:43 PM »

The subject was force, or the threat of and when it is appropriate. If you think it is appropriate for the government to use force to take your property, then freedom and liberty must be meaningless to you.

No you said
in a free society force is only used against criminals.

I said that if you don't pay taxes you are a criminal.
« Last Edit: May 30, 2010, 08:09:35 AM by John_in_NC » Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Print 
Real Estate Investing Forums  |  Real Estate Investing  |  Random Ramblings (Moderators: $Cash$, Bluemoon06, kdhastedt, Mdhaas, motivatedceo)  |  Topic: It's a New Record! FORTY MILLION AMERICANS ON FOOD STAMPS « previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Powered by SMF 1.1.8 | SMF © 2006-2012, Simple Machines LLC

 
Anti-Spam Policy | Compensation Disclosure | DMCA Notice | Earnings Disclaimer | External Links Policy | Privacy Policy | Terms And Conditions | View Cart
©2002-2012 All Rights Reserved. REIClub.com